01 Jun

In today's era, our digital traces are spread across the vastness of the internet, making privacy both valuable and hard to maintain. Even as we adapt to the increasingly digital world post-COVID-19, our right to privacy remains important amid technological advancements.

Nowhere is this debate more pronounced than in the cryptocurrency realm, where the principles of decentralized finance clash with regulatory oversight.

The Conflict Between Public Chains and Privacy

Public blockchains have made great advancements in security—fortifying against attacks, insulating smart contracts, and preventing data leaks—such as Ethereum and its multitude of EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) compatible chains. On the other hand, privacy frequently feels like the lamb sacrificed at the altar of efficiency and transparency.

Theoretically, decentralization and little personal data collecting should support our right to privacy. As these open ledgers proudly display their transparency, each transaction turns into a public event. While we applaud the security measures implemented, we also have to ask ourselves if protecting our private lives and property should end with asset security.

A Human Right at Risk of Financial Marginalization: Privacy

"The right to privacy without arbitrary interference" is a solemn declaration found in Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. "Those in the comfortable echelons of power grip tightly to their privacy while being cavalier with ours" is the irony that doesn't go away. The greatest contrast is arguably found in the financial sector, where elite privacy appears to be unassailable while that of the average citizen is steadily eroding.

Financial privacy is a defense of dignity rather than a free pass for misbehavior. However, privacy-focused coins are staring down a narrowing precipice as we continue to live in the early phases of cryptocurrency regulation—caught between the steely-eyed authorities wanting openness and the ardent supporters of financial autonomy.

Anonymity Coins: How Long Will They Last?

For those who value privacy, Monero, Zcash, and other cryptocurrencies with improved anonymity have captured the attention. By providing what appears to be a haven in a world where everything is monitored, these coins have increased the possibility of actual anonymity. However, my doubts about their durability stem from a harsh new reality: the stringent due diligence requirements that exchanges now have to meet could eventually make it difficult for pure privacy coins to find a home.

The removal of privacy coins from multiple exchanges is a clear indication of this harsh new day. A world in which the quest of anonymous transactions turns into a game of cat and mouse with a regulatory system that accepts no shadow. A world where compliance and privacy are pitted against one another.

Privacy Must Not Become a Victim

As we navigate the intricate web of privacy rights and cryptocurrency, let's uphold the principles of individual sovereignty and human dignity. In every way, privacy is the foundation of our freedom. Convenience or compulsion notwithstanding, to give in on this front is to accept a future in which we will own nothing, not even the sacredness of our anonymity.

The desire of the crypto community to incorporate privacy into its core principles will determine where it sits at this crossroads. Although we recognize the need for a framework to reduce illegal activity, we must fight the urge to disregard our right to privacy as antiquated vestiges.

Rather, let us pledge to work toward a time when technology empowers people and the right to privacy is respected and not only safeguarded, especially in the cryptocurrency industry.

We must not waver: regardless of technological advances, privacy is a fundamental human right that must survive, unwavering, and unalienable. It is not a convenience feature.

June 2024, Cryptoniteuae

* The email will not be published on the website.