01 Jun

Following OpenAI's announcement of its new Safety Committee, former board members Helen Toner and Tasha McCauley publicly accused CEO Sam Altman of prioritizing profits over responsible AI development, concealing important developments from the board, and fostering a toxic workplace environment. However, current board members Bret Taylor and Larry Summers defended Altman, disputing the accusations and suggesting that Toner and McCauley are attempting to reopen a resolved matter. The exchange unfolded through op-eds published in The Economist.

Toner and McCauley, who played a role in Altman's removal last year, asserted that the OpenAI board struggled to control its CEO. Conversely, Taylor and Summers, who joined OpenAI after Toner and McCauley's departure, supported Altman, rejecting the claims and affirming his dedication to safety and governance.

The former board members expressed concerns about OpenAI's ability to effectively oversee itself and its CEO. They cited "long-standing patterns of behavior" by Altman, which they claimed hindered the board's oversight of crucial decisions and internal safety measures. However, Altman's current colleagues referenced an independent review commissioned by the company, which concluded that there were no AI safety concerns necessitating Altman's replacement.

Toner and McCauley also accused Altman of fostering a toxic work culture, while Taylor and Summers countered that Altman is highly regarded by his employees and remains committed to collaborating with the government to mitigate AI development risks.

This public exchange occurred amid a tumultuous period for OpenAI, including Altman's brief removal, the departure of key personnel, controversies over the company's technology, and deals with the Department of Defense. Toner's recent claims on transparency issues, including Altman's undisclosed ownership of the OpenAI Startup Fund, have intensified the scrutiny on OpenAI's leadership.

June 2024, Cryptoniteuae

* The email will not be published on the website.